Davido Denies Dammy Krane’s Allegations of Royalty Theft, Claims He is the Creditor
A new controversy has erupted in the Afrobeats scene, involving two of its renowned artists. Davido, a Nigerian superstar, has rejected the accusations from his fellow singer Dammy Krane, who says that Davido has not paid him his share of royalties from a joint song. In a shocking twist, Davido denies these allegations, and says that it is Dammy Krane who owes him money.
The Claim and the Counterclaim
Dammy Krane, who has been pursuing Davido publicly since 2022, asserts that he has not received his due payment for their collaboration on the song ‘Pere.’ He says that this money is vital for him, as he needs it to cover his daughter’s education expenses. Davido, in reply, has given a different account of their financial relationship. He says that Dammy Krane is in debt to him for three song verses that he delivered nine years ago. Davido also discloses that he helped Dammy Krane during a time of hardship in Atlanta, offering him a place to stay and food to eat.
Unsettled Accounts and Ingratitude
According to Davido, there are unsettled accounts on both sides of this conflict. Not only does Dammy Krane owe him for the three verses he added to his songs, but Davido claims that he charges $150,000 per verse, implying that Dammy Krane’s debt amounts to a staggering $450,000. Davido also mentions that Dammy Krane never paid him for producing his song ‘Pooner.’
The extent of support Davido provided to Dammy Krane during his crisis highlights his frustration with the allegations. Davido’s reply tries to present a story of kindness and assistance, a sharp contrast to the image of an artist who refuses to pay owed royalties.
Implications of the Conflict
The public spat between Davido and Dammy Krane has ignited debates among fans and industry insiders. Some have picked sides, while others have condemned both artists for making their complaints public. This incident reveals the complexities of the music industry, where financial conflicts and disputes over creative contributions are common.
Furthermore, the conflict underscores the importance of contracts and clear agreements in the music industry. It emphasizes the need for artists to protect themselves and their work by ensuring that compensation is clearly specified. Open communication and professional resolution of conflicts, rather than resorting to public accusations and social media drama, are recommended.
In summary, the Davido and Dammy Krane conflict serves as a reminder of the challenges and complexities in the music industry. It advocates for the necessity of clear agreements, contracts, and professional communication in the resolution of conflicts, offering valuable lessons to artists and industry insiders alike.
